akovia (akov...@eml.cc) wrote:
> > I don't understand what you mean by "gap"? Are you saying that having a
> > corner at a node makes edit->stroke path leave gaps? Can you create a
> > screenshot?
> > 
> https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/93550827/temp/path-nodes.jpg

Wow. I don't know what happens there. Gut feeling: buggy cairo...

> > Note that if you drag the path closely to one node, the handle on the
> > opposite node will not be moved. Only a (largeish) area in the middle
> > moves both handles simultaneously (yet still with a shifting weight
> > depending on where you drag).
> > 
> Yeah, I am very aware of that. It's probably a bad habit but it always
> produced expected results with the old path tool so it's kinda ingrained
> in me now. I am always aware when I pop out the opposing handle in any
> meaningful way, but this happens at such a small scale that I never know
> it till I'm trying to stroke something.

note that "old path tool" is slightly misleading, the only thing that
has changed somewhat recently is the way the handles are drawn.


              si...@budig.de              http://simon.budig.de/
gimp-user-list mailing list
List address:    gimp-user-list@gnome.org
List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list
List archives:   https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gimp-user-list

Reply via email to