On 05.12.2015 20:20, sealed interface wrote:
> The GPL v2 license, under which GIMP is licensed
GNU GPL v3, at least if you are referring to recent releases.
> I am sending this to confirm if RollApp's claims are true, as it seemed
> unlikely for a very Copyleft organization like GIMP to allow for it to be
> sold this way.
I'm pretty sure that GIMP would have to be distributed under the GNU
AGPL in order to require anyone to release their code changes - but
regardless of that, basing a paid service on it would be perfectly legal.
One could argue that they are providing a Service as a Software
Substitute, as described in
But as the FSF states, this is not addressed by either the GNU GPL or
GNU AGPL, and probably not addressable in a Free Software license.
Maybe you can point out what exactly should be prevented, without
compromising the Freedom that's promoted by Free Software?
The one part in that statement that is - IMO - not entirely true is the
thing about being "in communication"; I think we basically ignore them.
GPG: 96A8 B38A 728A 577D 724D 60E5 F855 53EC B36D 4CDD
gimp-user-list mailing list
List address: firstname.lastname@example.org
List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list
List archives: https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gimp-user-list