Actually - from yoru description I guess you've created a Plugin UI where a copy of the image is shown and one draws the points?
That would be pretty close to unusable - I suggest you do abuse from the "path" tool at this point, which allows one to place independent handles already (although unconnected points require modifier + click) - -Then yu get the points, snap capability, and you can have a plug-in, or group of simpler plug-ins that could be grouped on a submenu, to perform actions based on points of the currently selected path. On 27 August 2017 at 14:52, Gimp-Monkey <[email protected]> wrote: > Thank you for the feedback. In fact the images are all mockups aka > doctored > screen shots and not the implementation. What I have actually got done > are the > dialogs and representation code doe the points / anchors via parasites. I > started researching how to pain them on the canvas independant of any > drawable > but got a little stuck there. So... hopefully next week when I have a > nice bock > of time I can unravel those mysteries. I will check out the ideas > referenced and > yeah look at 2.10. Thanks again. > > >Hi, > > > >First of all, it does look interesting, although: > > > >a) I'm not sure I understand 3), > >b) and 5) is already implemented in v2.9.x (git master branch, as well > >as 2.9.2 through 2.9.6) in a more common way, through the Layers > >dialog. > > > >It looks like it could also address the recent request for a > >Photoshop-like Count tool that adds similar points to count features > >in an image. See > >https://helpx.adobe.com/photoshop/using/counting-objects-image.html > >for more details. > > > >It also looks like you either hacked this into the Move tool (and > >renamed it) or based in on the Move tool. Which one is it? > > > >Finally, as far as I can tell, your code is based on GIMP 2.8.x code > >base. We recently moved canvas interaction code from tools to new > >reusable (sub)classes in git master (and 2.9.6), so you'd have to > >update your patch accordingly to make it work with upcoming 2.10. > >You'd have to look at subclasses of GimpToolWidet or ask mitch > >directly on IRC for more hints. And I have a strong suspicion that > >updating your code to work with git master would be a hard requirement > >for code review, should mitch et al. decide to include this. > > > >Alex > > -- > Gimp-Monkey (via www.gimpusers.com/forums) > _______________________________________________ > gimp-user-list mailing list > List address: [email protected] > List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list > List archives: https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gimp-user-list > _______________________________________________ gimp-user-list mailing list List address: [email protected] List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list List archives: https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gimp-user-list
