sam ende wrote:

On Sunday 14 September 2003 01:07, Carol Spears wrote:

what is the difference between these two things?

i'm not sure either, though i have thought that gap might be 'easier' to run without gimp on machines that have limited resources, maybe i'm wrong, i have no idea of the technologies involved.
whati have been doing with gap is to use xaos output and add effects.
gap does not support png though and what i do is to open the first image of the sequence and then convert them all to jpegs, after doing whatever it is i do i then can use gap to make an mpeg. i can't do any of that with cinepaint afaik. a problem i have found is that an image created in xaos is 'out of image resolution bounds' according to gimp, not knowing how to change that i end up often generating a couple of thousand message errors :), does this have something to do with the 8 bit resolution thingy ? (sorry, i am really not technology minded).

cinepaint doesn't seem to have any of the functions gap has ? i fact i haven't been able to discern what functions it does have that gimp doesn't, so i'm not sure why one would want to merge ?


well, lets work on gap then.

i was not able to build it from cvs, but the tarball i got from worked. to be honest, i have not played with this plugin very much. i have a tough time with a single image ....

can someone add png and mng support to it? both png and mng have that comment space :)


_______________________________________________ Gimp-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to