Michael Schumacher wrote:
> I'd like to add:
> 4) A small group preselects a few (3, 5, 10, ?) images from the
> submissions, and a larger group votes for them like in option 3).
I would just like to point out that the reason I would prefer to
avoid #3 (and for the same reason #4) is time and infrastructure.
We don't have any technical infrastructure for counting votes,
and say 4 people come up with 10 candidates, we could be voting
for days before we get a result, when we all want the 2.2 release
as quickly as possible - and that could be as soon as the end of
E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gimp-user mailing list