i think you'll find somewhere in GPL you cant distribute it under another name and have no reference to GPL on the site

and if this is the way GPL works you need to seriously rethink it

From: <pcg( Marc)@goof(A.).(Lehmann )com>
To: steve hudson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, gimp-user@lists.xcf.berkeley.edu
Subject: Re: [Gimp-user] GIMP RENAMED and sold on eBay
Date: Sat, 12 Feb 2005 11:50:31 +0100

On Sat, Feb 12, 2005 at 11:45:13AM +0100, Marc Lehmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> "free" refers to the terms that source code is distributed at no extra
> charge and with full modification rights, not to the actual price.

Actually, the GPL FAQ says:

     Does the GPL allow me to charge a fee for downloading the program
     from my site?

     Yes. You can charge any fee you wish for distributing a copy of the
     program. If you distribute binaries by download, you must provide
     "equivalent access" to download the source--therefore, the fee to
     download source may not be greater than the fee to download the

                The choice of a
      -----==-     _GNU_
      ----==-- _       generation     Marc Lehmann
      ---==---(_)__  __ ____  __      [EMAIL PROTECTED]
      --==---/ / _ \/ // /\ \/ /      http://schmorp.de/
      -=====/_/_//_/\_,_/ /_/\_\      XX11-RIPE

Gimp-user mailing list

Reply via email to