On Thursday 14 April 2005 18:51, Jim Clark wrote:
> I no-dithered and I crushed and I reduced my 10 images from 165084
> to 113479 without using any thumbnails. 50K isn't 100K, but it is a
> significant reduction, and with no visible loss of image quality.
>
> Worked well--thanks for the pointers.
>

Well...so good for the PNG's..but if trading space for quality is what 
you want, than, just check the old JPGs ... 
> Jim Clark

Regards,
        JS
        -><-
_______________________________________________
Gimp-user mailing list
Gimp-user@lists.xcf.berkeley.edu
http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user

Reply via email to