John R. Culleton wrote:

> Not at all. I was noting that on two different flavors of linux
> it is necessary to download and install material beyond that
> contained in the Gimp download in order to get it to compile. And
> that wasn't true in prior versions. Perhaps the missing module
> should be put in with the Gimp tarball if that is legal and
> practical.

That suggestion would imply that all dependencies be packaged which is nonsense!

Gimp-user mailing list

Reply via email to