On Saturday 04 March 2006 09:07, Geoffrey wrote: > I've heard very little about GIMPSHOP, yet you claim it's 'generated > more excitement then the Gimp ever has.'
Amongst artists I know, yes, it has. > How about backing up your statement with some facts? Google: > > gimp: 30,600,000 hits > gimpshop: 447,000 hits Those are facts? > Wow, that's a lot of excitement alright. 447 THOUSAND hits? Yeah, you're right, it is. I am surprised it was that many...Thanks for supporting my point. > > You say better... > > I think we have reached the limit of your ability to converse > > thoughtfully in this conversation. > > My ability extends well beyond your understanding. Wow, I'm impressed, Obi-Wan. Who's the troll now, tough guy? > > Oh well, it's done, so let's take what it generated and try to bring > > something positive out of it. Trying to surf the wave of interest would > > be NICE. > > Just because something has 'happened' doesn't mean you accept it. The point is: you don't have to accept or not accept it...USE it to further your own goals... > I personally don't want to start seeing confusing posts regarding > interfaces because someone is posting about gimpshop on a gimp list. Of all the things to worry about...I'd be glad that it was that popular to even cause a problem. Let's jump off that bridge when we get to it. > I'd suggest that someone create a GIMPSHOP list and post questions > regarding that charade there. I'm sorry, but your huffy-puffy attitude reminds me of those Grey Poupon commercials. _______________________________________________ Gimp-user mailing list Gimp-user@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user
