True, so here goes for my case:
>> .. professional IT setting, whatever that is. ..
Windows desktops for Administration, Accounting, Drafting, Engineering,
and Executive personnel.
>> .. Novell, Inc. .. as part of their enterprise OS. ..
Not user facing. It's a Windows world, let's be honest. I run Linux on
every server except 2, but servers don't need graphic editors.
Thanks for the clarification. Sorry if I misinterpreted your point
From: Jakub Steiner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, September 29, 2006 2:08 PM
To: Roland Hordos
Cc: Sven Neumann; gimp-user@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
Subject: RE: [Gimp-user] Please Change the Derogatory Name
On Fri, 2006-09-29 at 12:38 -0600, Roland Hordos wrote:
> >> can you proove your claim?
> Sigh. Try googling "is gimp a derogatory term". If you read the
> sources at the first 10 hits and you still don't understand, then try
> the next 15000.
what Sven possibly meant here was for you to prove that the name GIMP is
a reason why the product isn't used in a professional IT setting,
whatever that is. I have been using GIMP professionally for over 5 years
and Novell, Inc. for example doesn't have a problem selling it as part
of their enterprise OS.
Jakub Steiner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Gimp-user mailing list