On Sun, 1 Oct 2006, Geoffrey wrote:

> > Not really a "product" per se, but I'd say you nailed it.
> >
> > Personally, I would never be caught dead in a Hooters.  Your example
> > leads me to believe you'd equate the quality of GIMP users with the
> > quality of Hooter's clientele.  Maybe that wasn't your intention...
> > (boy, this thread has gone nutty).
> No, it certainly was not.  In my mind the comparison of GIMP to Hooters
> is not valid.  GIMP is not intended to be derogatory, but we all know
> how Hooters gets it's name.
> I'm a GIMP user as well, thus I don't equate myself with the scum you'll
> find frequenting Hooters. :)

Do you have a problem with owls?  The name is perfectly acceptable!


Gimp-user mailing list

Reply via email to