jim wrote:

>Eric P wrote:
>  
>
>>I'm lazy, and I don't feel like reading this entire thread (it seems to show 
>>up on a regular basis on the list).
>>
>>Were any new, constructive insights brought up?  Anyone care to summarize 
>>this thread on this exhausting topic?
>>
>>    
>>
>
>Summary to date: Noobs keep joining the list and want the name changed
>to match their sensibilities.  They threaten to continue to add to the
>noise part of the signal to noise ratio until they get their way (see
>"kill file").  I suggest a new list dedicated to their traffic;
>gimp-name-haters@, thereby relieving the rest of the users and devo's
>from actually having to slog through their repeated attempts at "reasoning".
>
>At least at the current levels, it's easy to know when a thread starts
>heading in that direction, and tell t'bird to bit bucket the messages.
>
>jim
>
>  
>
Or how about adding a section to the list-etiquette, referring them to 
one of the earlier threads?
Anything to pre-empt the very tedious subject coming up yet again ;-)

Doug
_______________________________________________
Gimp-user mailing list
Gimp-user@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user

Reply via email to