On Wednesday 26 September 2007, Greg wrote:
> --- gimp_user <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > ...[GIMP] does not have an interface that makes for an easy user
> > transition from the industry PS standard it is not a tool that is
> > ready for adoption by high quality image makers.
> I would disagree with this. I use both PS and GIMP and thanks to PH I
> had no problems learning GIMP's UI. Of course, your millage will vary.
> In fact, there are more similarities than differences:
> o Each has a palette of editing tools on one side of the screen
> o Each has additional tool palettes on the other side (e.g., layers)
> o And each has a main image window
> The UI differences, IMO, are minor:
> o Distinct windows for palettes and image window
> o Options moved from top of window to below editing tools
> o Image window enhanced with its own menu bar.
> Even most of the icons are similar to Photoshop. Unless your brand new
> to Photoshop, I don't see the problem.
Just because you don't understand it does not mean that it is not a large
issue. I would tend to agree, but not with your conclusion.
Gimp-user mailing list