On Saturday 29 September 2007 07:46:37 Patrick Shanahan wrote:
> * gimp_user <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [09-29-07 02:00]:
> > On Friday 28 September 2007 14:12:30 David Southwell wrote:
> > > On Friday 28 September 2007 10:45:14 Sven Neumann wrote:
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > On Fri, 2007-09-28 at 04:04 -0700, gimp_user wrote:
> > > > > While the absence of a recognised skill transition route (i.e. no
> > > > > skin similar to PS) is a serious obstacle affecting the ability of
> > > > > multiple individuals to collaborate in a supply chain comprising
> > > > > multiple organisations it is far from being the only reason while
> > > > > Gimp is not currently in a position to seriously challenge PS.
> > >
> > > On Friday 28 September 2007 09:14:50 gimp_user wrote:
> > > > On Friday 28 September 2007 06:20:05 gimp_user wrote:
> > > > > On Friday 28 September 2007 04:04:03 gimp_user wrote:
> > > > > > On Thursday 27 September 2007 08:00:45 George Farris wrote:
> > > > > > > --- gimp_user <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > > > > > ...[GIMP] does not have an interface that makes for an easy
> > > > > > > > user
> ... [much *unnecessary* quoted mat'l removed]....
> While your quoting style suits you and *is* quite complete, frankly it
> is a "pain in the ass" to read and very unnecessary as are the
> personal posts you made to me. I read the list and am quite capable
> of reading your responses to the list. A personal response is only
> necessary if unrelated to list traffic and/or really of a personal
> Anyone who reads the list will have seen your earlier posts and be
> aware of the thread history. Most capable individuals will be able to
> recapture anything that they may have missed if that interested.
> IMNSHO, it is only necessary for you to quote enough material to put
> your answers (?) or arguments into perspective. As a linux user you
> *are* held to a higher value and your contributions *will* be seen in
> the same light and value as you present yourself here which your
> quoting manerism reflects and detracts.
> please see:
> no response necessary or expected!
Well if pou need to be that arrogant I dont not suppose you can be deterred
Gimp-user mailing list