Geoffrey wrote:
> JC Dill wrote:
> 
>> I can hardly be expected to know about something that hasn't been 
>> incorporated, or has just recently been incorporated but not widely 
>> announced.  As I said - I'm a "potential Gimp user".  I tried it several 
>> years ago, and I am subscribed to this list to stay abreast with the 
>> changes that are discussed on this list.  I don't currently have it 
>> installed.  Like millions of other potential Gimp users, I don't have 
>> time to install and test it every time you release a new version to see 
>> if it's "ready for prime time" yet.  Rather than try to convince me it's 
>> great (while you also admit you are "just beginning" to incorporate 
>> needed changes as a result of a usability evaluation), it would be nice 
>> if you would just admit that it still needs a lot of work, and that you 
>> will let the user (and potential user) community know when you have 
>> actually done the work to make it easier to use for non-programmers.
> 
> 
> Troll back to Photoshop please.
> 
> I for one, appreciate the work the GIMP developers have done and 
> continue to do on this wonderful application.  JC, you just doesn't get 
> it.  I guess you missed the reference to the fact that ALL the work put 
> into GIMP is done by the developers on their time.
> 

My sentiments exactly!

GIMP on!

Eric P.
_______________________________________________
Gimp-user mailing list
Gimp-user@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user

Reply via email to