alec wrote:

> Akkana Peck wrote:

>> Resolution (as in dots-per-inch) is irrelevant for images used on
>> web-pages. The only thing that counts is the number of pixels.
> Huh, I thought that lower resolution would make the file size smaller so
> web images would load faster.  No?

Depends what you are *really* referring to.

Bob Long
Gimp-user mailing list

Reply via email to