Hey people, I didn't start this thread. Don't grind my ass...
All I did was mention the obvious features that GIMP doesn't have
compared to PS. And I meant competitive *WITH* not *AGAINST*
PS. It doesn't have to replace PS -- if GIMP is to eventually
have the same utility of PS then it needs the features (and more)
that I mentioned.
Why would anyone get their knickers in a bunch about that and start
shouting "...put up or shut up..."
To be clear, I will *NEVER* work on the innards of GIMP. But I will
use it for so long as it is available and meets my current needs.
And if you or anybody else doesn't like that idea -- stop making it
available. Keep it to yourself. Let only developers use it.
Like I give a shit....
> On Sunday 17 January 2010 09:03:32 Norman Silverstone wrote:
>>>> There are a few things that GIMP needs to be competitive with PS.
>>> Just a few? :)
>> Why is it necessary for GIMP to be competitive with PS?
> I agree with the above 100%. Why? I like GIMP, for me is useful and I support
> open source.
> Who doesn't like it or it is not enough for her/his work there are many other
> Gimp-user mailing list
Gimp-user mailing list