Philip Rhoades wrote:
> It still seems counter intuitive that opening a JPG (even if it is a
> photo rather than a computer generated image) and immediately saving it
> with 100% "quality" increases the size by 2.5 . .
so you mean the scale should be different? Like
1 .. 10 ... 100 ... 100000
| \ extravagant luxury quality for the filthy rich
i'm not shure if that would not create even more confusion...
PS: as Michael Schumacher previously noted, the quality value
is indeed just a number, not a percentage.
Gimp-user mailing list