Philip Rhoades wrote:
> It still seems counter intuitive that opening a JPG (even if it is a 
> photo rather than a computer generated image) and immediately saving it 
> with 100% "quality" increases the size by 2.5 . .

so you mean the scale should be different? Like

1 .. 10 ... 100 ... 100000
             ^         ^
             |          \ extravagant luxury quality for the filthy rich
        current "90"
         default


i'm not shure if that would not create even more confusion...

regards,
peter


PS: as Michael Schumacher previously noted, the quality value
    is indeed just a number, not a percentage.

_______________________________________________
Gimp-user mailing list
Gimp-user@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user

Reply via email to