Frank Gore wrote: >>> But a much better and simpler idea is to just use a >>> number range from 1..13, similar to photoshop. >>> >>> I'll take that over to the developer's list. > > I disagree, I think Photoshop's way of displaying the JPG compression > slider is ridiculous. You can move the slider back and forth within a > very wide range before the corresponding number changes. And since the > slider doesn't spring back to a pre-determined spot on the line, that > means one could select a different grade of "level 8" depending on > where the slider is positioned. You can actually see this by looking > at the file size. If I select the lower range of "level 8", the file > is smaller than if I pick the higher range of "level 8".
I fully agree that this is bad design. If there are interstages of say, 8.0 8.25 8.5 and 8.75, those clearly have to be displayed. regards, peter _______________________________________________ Gimp-user mailing list Gimp-user@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user