On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 8:43 AM, Tőkés Ábel <preobazsensz...@freemail.hu> wrote:
> I imagine there can be a non-trivial problem with the concept if the linked
> layers are not all neighbors:
> if there is at least one layer that is not one of the linked, but between
> those. In this case, where would the
> merged layer be: above or below the middle one?
Honestly, it should just be part of the default feature set in Gimp.
I'm a bit shocked that it still isn't.
Gimp-user mailing list