On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 3:20 PM, Martin Nordholts <ense...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 02/02/2011 02:32 PM, Jeremy Nell wrote: >> Will the next release of Gimp be a bit quicker? > > I'm afraid not; the next release of GIMP, GIMP 2.8, will not be quicker > in this regard. > > The release after that, GIMP 3.0, will focus on running on GTK 3.0 and > bringing high bit depths into the picture. > > 3.2 will focus on non-destructiveness > > Maybe in 3.4 we'll have time to solve this in a proper way.
Actually, this may well be solved for GIMP 3.0 - as it will them most depend on GEGL improvements. Pippin has detailed the improvements that could be done on GEGL with regards to speed rendering in a document he posted on Tuesday (I don't remember if it was to this list): mostly improvements that would allow the image viewport to be real time rendered, while the real rendering would happen in background. js -><- > / Martin > > > -- > > My GIMP Blog: > http://www.chromecode.com/ > "Nightly GIMP, GEGL, babl tarball builds" > _______________________________________________ > Gimp-user mailing list > Gimp-user@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU > https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user > _______________________________________________ Gimp-user mailing list Gimp-user@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user