On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 6:06 PM, Ofnuts <ofn...@laposte.net> wrote:
> 325 bytes is already in the trivial size range... This said, you should
> be using PNG, a much better format for Web graphics outside of photos.
> In this format a 5*35 gradient image in 212 bytes, but you can likely
> reduce it to 1*35 (157 bytes)
And pngcrush might be able to shave off a few bytes afterward - I've
gotten mixed results myself, but if bandwidth is a huge concern it may
be worth a try.
Gimp-user mailing list