On Wed, 11 May 2011 18:15:42 -0500, Chris Mohler wrote:

> And pngcrush might be able to shave off a few bytes afterward - I've
> gotten mixed results myself, but if bandwidth is a huge concern it may
> be worth a try.

After pngcrush, also process the image with AdvPNG (which is much faster,
and sometimes achieves better compression than pngcrush)
<http://advancemame.sourceforge.net/comp-readme.html> and PNGOUT but only
if you have a lot of time) <http://www.advsys.net/ken/utils.htm>.

< Jernej Simončič ><><><><>< http://eternallybored.org/ >

Gimp-user mailing list

Reply via email to