I got Gimp 1.1.11 compiled it, had to get a few extra packages (i.e. PDL and so on)
compiled it again, still got a few errors, but it installed any way (I don't know a
thing about compiling and such stuff - will leave it to the guys that do - I just
followed the instructions).

now my "script-fu" is not working (most of them), will have to go and figure what is
needed to get it to work again.

but my impression so far;

I am very impressed

Thanks again

Olof S Kylander wrote:

> Hello
> You can't do it with Gimp 1.0 but you can do it with the developers
> version of Gimp i.e Gimp 1.1.x .
> A work around is to calculate it your self (described in the PrePress
> Chapter). Say e.g that you want 210ppi res in a 4"x4" image. Then you
> should create a 840x840 pixels image in Gimp.
> Cheers Olof S Kylander
> --
> Olof Kylander  Frozenriver Digital Design
> Consultant at Sigma nBiT
> Technical writer and coauthor of GUM (the Gimp User Manual)
> On Tue, 23 Nov 1999, Koot wrote:
> > I am new to these lists, and it is interesting to see how much energy is wasted
> > on something totally irrelevant to the subject i.e. get terrence of the list
> > ;-)
> > My question is, if I ask a question, will it receive the same amount of
> > attention? Or should I ask; will it receive the same amount of devotion?
> > If it does, then surely I must get an answer to my question.
> >
> > So what is my question?
> > How do I create an graphic with a higher dpi than the default 72 (or more
> > accurate ppi?), and save it as an tiff file, not a postscript file?
> > The Gimp manual suggest saving the file as a ps, but I would prefer using tiff
> > format at this stage (still learning so one step at a time)
> > Then also, if I want to do a poster (with a higher dpi than 72), following the
> > suggestion in the Gimp manual, Gimp creates a huge file, and doing anything
> > useful with Gimp becomes impossible.
> >
> > Thanks a lot
> >
> > (I am sending this to both the user and developer list, as I am not sure where
> > the terrence thing originated from :-))
> >
> >
> >

Reply via email to