> > Nikolai
> Often these "model" sites and p0rn sites and so on, use a very high
> resolution scanner (1200dpi not interopolated) like a drum scanner to get
> the image quality you see here, including the glossyness.
I also have scanner that can scan at 1200. I don't know if it is
interpolated (probably not because it is cheap) but do you think if I
scan at 1200 (or even at 2400) I could make better quality photos than
if I scan at 300? I tryed to scan at 1200 then applied pixelize filter
and then resized to 150x200 pixels(72dpi) but didn't achieve any visible
quality increases. Also, I don't know if retouching at higher depths
helps more than retouching at 300 dpi.
> I could be wrong here, but that is generally how they are done. Then they
> can retouch some areas. I looked at the site and it looked like some retouch
> work was done on one model's eyes for example.
> __ _ Carl B. Constantine
> / / (_)__ __ ____ __ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> / /__/ / _ \/ // /\ \/ / (2.2.14) ICQ: 26351441
> /____/_/_//_/\_ _/ /_/\_\ Stormix 2000
> PGP key available on request
> "On the net, no one knows you're a Duck!"