Marc Lehmann wrote:

> On Mon, Aug 07, 2000 at 11:48:20AM +0100, Alan Buxey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > 'specialised' and 'conventions' spell proprietary in my book.
> > whats wrong with the 'open' RPM standard embraced by the tools already on
> > most Linux, Solaris, Un8X systems?
> At least according to daniel egger, suse and redhat already use (and need)
> different specs files for gimp.

    Isn't this mostly differences in a given distribution's choices about file
locations?  For example, SuSE puts binaries for X in /usr/bin/X11.  RPMs I've used to
upgrade apps keep putting X binaries in /usr/bin. (Is that the Red Hat standard?)

Reply via email to