After reading your mail i've noticed that there's a link to on the Cool Links part, it's just under the link ;)

On 16 August 2000 at 16:40, James Smaby wrote:

>Is it just me, or are these CubicDesign tutorials a little too
>close to porn howtos?  Must the object of the image touchup be
>a large breasted model?  I don't know about most people, but I
>don't really want people thinking I'm looking at porn when I'm
>really reading about one of these tutorials.  Perhaps somthing
>a little safer next time, like a bowl of fruit or a house.  Am
>I too nieve to think that half-naked pictures are not the best
>thing to use as examples?  If a person is necessary (like when
>flesh tones are required as in the latest tutorial), a closeup
>shot of Clinton or Gates might make a better picture (no, I do
>not want to see them in a bikini (although that might make for
>a funny tutorial), I mean a closeup of thier face).  According
>to a slashdot observation, apache is the http server of choice
>of the porn industry; is the gimp the image editor of choice?
>-James Smaby


All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy.

Reply via email to