I have also had very few problems with v5.00 drivers (Cakewalk 8.04).
Haven't used them with Winamp, though, all my internet stuff is on a
different machine.

Terry

-----Original Message-----
From: Tim Huskisson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: 07 September 1999 01:21
Subject: Re: [gina-users] 5.00 drivers... :)


>Well I have to say that the version 5 drivers are a god-send for me. For
the
>first time I can use Algorithmix 'Sound-Laundry in 'direct mode' which
until
>now just crashed the computer when ever I tried it.
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Electrostatic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Date: Monday, September 06, 1999 10:52 PM
>Subject: Re: [gina-users] 5.00 drivers... :)
>
>
>>Gustavo,
>>I installed the 5.00 GINA drivers, too and my WinAmp skips like crazy.
>MP3's are
>>are very big part of my band, so I installed the 4.05 drivers again until
>they
>>can come up with an update to fix it.
>>Why can't they ever get this stuff right? Did they finally get direct
sound
>to
>>work, or is that still screwed up, too?
>>Regards,
>>Rob
>>
>>Gustavo Ruiz wrote:
>>
>>>         I'm the only one with sync problems in 5.00 www.echoaudio.com
>>> drivers for GINA? WinAMP skips entire parts of a song with this drivers.
>>>
>>>         Please! I need some feedback before I email (again) those people
>>> complaining about that :)))
>>>
>>> --
>>> SodA - Gustavo Ruiz
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>>--
>>--------------------------------------------------------
>>       Rob Gardner - drums/drum programming.
>>      _           _                 _        _   _
>>  ___| | ___  ___| |_ _ __ ___  ___| |_ __ _| |_(_) ___
>> / _ \ |/ _ \/ __| __| '__/ _ \/ __| __/ _` | __| |/ __|
>>|  __/ |  __/ (__| |_| | | (_) \__ \ || (_| | |_| | (__
>> \___|_|\___|\___|\__|_|  \___/|___/\__\__,_|\__|_|\___|
>>
>>       http://www.primenet.com/~mteeb/electrostatic
>>       mp3 music at http://www.mp3.com/electrostatic
>>--------------------------------------------------------
>>
>>
>

Reply via email to