How about the MIT or BSD license? Those are pretty permissive.
On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 1:17 PM, Muthucumaru Maheswaran <mahes...@cs.mcgill.ca> wrote: > I see we are using the GPL licence. There are others like LGPL. We might > want to use > a "liberal" licence in case a strict one like GPL makes GINI less > attractive. > > > -----Original Message----- > From: gini-devel-boun...@cs.mcgill.ca > [mailto:gini-devel-boun...@cs.mcgill.ca] On Behalf Of Alexis Malozemoff > Sent: Monday, September 28, 2009 1:14 PM > To: gini-devel@cs.mcgill.ca > Subject: [Gini-devel] 2.0.1 release > > I merged the devel/ branch to stable/ for GINI version 2.0.1. > Please try it out to make sure everything works; so far it's worked > for me. I will also update the website. > > Alex > _______________________________________________ > gini-devel mailing list > gini-devel@cs.mcgill.ca > http://mailman.cs.mcgill.ca/mailman/listinfo/gini-devel > > _______________________________________________ gini-devel mailing list gini-devel@cs.mcgill.ca http://mailman.cs.mcgill.ca/mailman/listinfo/gini-devel
