Argh I meant "It should just an option to help review and should not
be required for patches."

- Henry

On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 11:51 AM, Henry Saputra <henry.sapu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> +1
>
> It should just optional to help review not required.
>
> - Henry
>
> On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 11:48 AM, Jakob Homan <jgho...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> We've just gone around on this one for Kafka and, if reviewboard is
>> provided, it would be good to keep it as an optional part of the
>> process.  I've had very negative experiences with it, both in Hadoop
>> and Hive.  If one would like to do a reviewboard review, that's great
>> - but for those who don't, standard bullet points should suffice.
>> -jakob
>>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 11:38 AM, Avery Ching <ach...@yahoo-inc.com> wrote:
>>> Thanks Henry.  I have filed issue
>>>
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-3892
>>>
>>> to get reviewboard access.
>>>
>>> Avery
>>>
>>> On Aug 30, 2011, at 11:35 AM, Henry Saputra wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Avery, yes you should file INFRA ticket to add Giraph as Groups in
>>> reviews board.
>>>
>>> I filed tickets to create one for Kafka and Gora.
>>>
>>> - Henry
>>>
>>> On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 10:13 PM, Avery Ching 
>>> <ach...@yahoo-inc.com<mailto:ach...@yahoo-inc.com>> wrote:
>>> https://blogs.apache.org/infra/entry/reviewboard_instance_running_at_the
>>>
>>> I'll file an INFRA ticket.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>> Avery
>>>
>>> On Aug 29, 2011, at 10:07 PM, Hyunsik Choi wrote:
>>>
>>> Looks possible. Some incubator project (e.g., Kafka) already has a
>>> reviewboard group.
>>>
>>> Best regards,
>>> --
>>> Hyunsik Choi
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 1:48 PM, Avery Ching 
>>> <ach...@yahoo-inc.com<mailto:ach...@yahoo-inc.com>> wrote:
>>> Anyone know if we have reviewboard access?
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>> Avery
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>

Reply via email to