RTC is definitely the way to go (he said with a weary sigh).

On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 6:32 AM, Owen O'Malley <o...@hortonworks.com> wrote:
> All,
>   It seems that we've implicitly picked review then commit (RTC) instead of 
> commit then review (CTR). Apache projects allow either approach and I'm fine 
> with either. We should just state what we are doing.
>   I'd also like to propose that we keep a CHANGES.txt file that includes who 
> contributed and committed each patch. I've created GIRAPH-19 to do that.
>
> Thoughts?
>
> -- Owen

Reply via email to