+1 for the source release from me.
On Thu, Feb 2, 2012 at 9:03 PM, Hyunsik Choi <hyun...@apache.org> wrote:
> I also checked the compile, all tests pass, gpg sign, and md5 sign.
> +1 for both the source release and the binary tarball release.
> Hyunsik Choi
> On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 8:36 AM, Jakob Homan <jgho...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Giraphers-
> > I've created a candidate for our first release. It's a source release
> > without a binary for two reasons: first, there's still discussion
> > going on about what needs to be done for the NOTICE and LICENSE files
> > for projects that bring in transitive dependencies to the binary
> > release (
> > http://email@example.com/msg32693.html)
> > and second because we're still munging our binary against three types
> > of Hadoop, which would mean we'd need to release three different
> > binary artifacts, which seems suboptimal. Hopefully both of these
> > issues will be addressed by 0.2.
> > I've tested the release against an unsecure 20.2 cluster. It'd be
> > great to test it against other configurations. Note that we're voting
> > on the tag; the files are provided as a convenience.
> > Release notes:
> > Release artifacts:
> > http://people.apache.org/~jghoman/giraph-0.1.0-incubating-rc0/
> > Corresponding svn tag:
> > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/giraph/tags/release-0.1-rc0/
> > Our signing keys (my key doesn't seem to be being picked up by
> > http://people.apache.org/keys/group/giraph.asc):
> > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/giraph/KEYS
> > The vote runs for 72 hours, until Friday 4pm PST. After a successful
> > vote here, Incubator will vote on the release as well.
> > Thanks,
> > Jakob