In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, girlsown-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
>It would be tempting to suggest that the ill health suffered by the mothers
>of so many GO heroines resulted from married womenâs confinement to the
>role of homemaker and their lack of independent means. Such a case does not
>stand up. Many GO mothers seem happy enough
But of course they aren't real women; illness, as you rightly suggest,
is a device of the author's.
Barbara, I assume you mean by this that the authors don't suggest that
illness is the result of oppression. But in a way they do, because the
alternative in eg Oxenham is bracing physical activity, girlish
togetherness, and breeziness, which were all novel values, vaguely
associated with being a new girl, if not a New Woman. Lying around on
sofas stops being heroic and self-sacrificing and becomes selfish and
manipulative. True Mothers conceal their illnesses until they finally
keel over while doing the mending.
PS I really want to mention the Merediths in Rainbow Valley here, where
not having a mother is to be completley unsocialised.
>The one constant is that most girls love their
>mothers, however inadequate they may be, and that the fear of loss of a
>parent is one of childhoodâs greatest dreads.
Indeed, but arguably there's a subtle aggressiveness about the constant
fantasies of mum expiring which couldn't find a more legitimate outlet.
Isn't it also a notion of making the character more valuable to the
And also a representation - as you very rightly suggest - of maternal
selflessness - Mum works herself to death? So inducing pangs of reader-
Girlsown mailing list
For self-administration and access to archives see
For FAQs see http://www.club-web.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/girlsown/faq-0.htm