On 11/10, Stefan Beller wrote:
> @@ -500,6 +586,18 @@ void copy_pathspec(struct pathspec *dst, const struct
> pathspec *src)
>
> void clear_pathspec(struct pathspec *pathspec)
> {
> + int i, j;
> + for (i = 0; i < pathspec->nr; i++) {
> + if (!pathspec->items[i].attr_match_nr)
> + continue;
> + for (j = 0; j < pathspec->items[j].attr_match_nr; j++)This looks like a bug. Should it be: for (j = 0; j < pathspec->items[i].attr_match_nr; j++) where items[j] -> items[i] -- Brandon Williams
