On Wed, Dec 28, 2016 at 2:41 AM, Junio C Hamano <[email protected]> wrote:
> Karthik Nayak <[email protected]> writes:
>
>> Currently the 'lstrip=<N>' option only takes a positive value '<N>'
>> and strips '<N>' slash-separated path components from the left. Modify
>> the 'lstrip' option to also take a negative number '<N>' which would
>> only _leave_ behind 'N' slash-separated path components from the left.
>
> "would only leave behind N components from the left" sounds as if
> the result is A/B, when you are given A/B/C/D/E and asked to
> lstrip:-2. Given these two tests added by the patch ...
>
>> +test_atom head refname:lstrip=-1 master
>> +test_atom head refname:lstrip=-2 heads/master
>
> ... I somehow think that is not what you wanted to say. Instead,
> you strip from the left as many as necessary and leave -N
> components that appear at the right-most end, no?
>
Yup, you're correct it should be 'leave -N components from the right-most
end'. Will change that.
>> --- a/Documentation/git-for-each-ref.txt
>> +++ b/Documentation/git-for-each-ref.txt
>> @@ -98,7 +98,8 @@ refname::
>> abbreviation mode. If `lstrip=<N>` is appended, strips `<N>`
>> slash-separated path components from the front of the refname
>> (e.g., `%(refname:lstrip=2)` turns `refs/tags/foo` into `foo`.
>> - `<N>` must be a positive integer.
>> + if `<N>` is a negative number, then only `<N>` path components
>> + are left behind.
>
> I think positive <N> is so obvious not to require an example but it
> is good that you have one. The negative <N> case needs illustration
> more than the positive case. Perhaps something like:
>
> (e.g. %(refname:lstrip=-1) strips components of refs/tags/frotz
> from the left to leave only one component, i.e. 'frotz').
Good point, but i'll be using N = -2 rather than -1 since N=-1 can
also be obtained
by using N=2 as shown in the existing documentation. With N=-2 we differentiate
the use cases of N= positive and negative numbers.
diff --git a/Documentation/git-for-each-ref.txt
b/Documentation/git-for-each-ref.txt
index 9123c6f..814d77a 100644
--- a/Documentation/git-for-each-ref.txt
+++ b/Documentation/git-for-each-ref.txt
@@ -99,7 +99,8 @@ refname::
slash-separated path components from the front of the refname
(e.g., `%(refname:lstrip=2)` turns `refs/tags/foo` into `foo`.
if `<N>` is a negative number, then only `<N>` path components
- are left behind.
+ are left behind. (e.g., `%(refname:lstrip=-2)` turns
+ `refs/tags/foo` into `tags/foo`).
>
> Would %(refname:lstrip=-4) attempt to strip components of
> refs/tags/frotz from the left to leave only four components, and
> because the original does not have that many components, it ends
> with refs/tags/frotz?
>
It ends up with 'refs/tags/frotz' since there are not enough components.
> I am debating myself if we need something like "When the ref does
> not have enough components, the result becomes an empty string if
> stripping with positive <N>, or it becomes the full refname if
> stripping with negative <N>. Neither is an error." is necessary
> here. Or is it too obvious?
I had the same self-debate, and dropped it for being too obvious.
On Wed, Dec 28, 2016 at 8:38 AM, Jacob Keller <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> I do not think it hurts to have, and makes this obvious.
>
But as Jacob mentioned, it doesn't hurt to mention the obvious
sometimes. So i'll
add that in :)
--
Regards,
Karthik Nayak
