Hi,
Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason wrote:
> --- a/t/README
> +++ b/t/README
> @@ -612,8 +612,10 @@ library for your script to use.
> - test_have_prereq <prereq>
>
> Check if we have a prerequisite previously set with
> - test_set_prereq. The most common use of this directly is to skip
> - all the tests if we don't have some essential prerequisite:
> + test_set_prereq. The most common use-case for using this directly,
> + as opposed to as an argument to test_expect_*, is to skip all the
> + tests at the start of the test script if we don't have some
> + essential prerequisite:
Nit: the hyphenated word "use-case" feels jargon-ish. I've seen it
more often as two separate words. Better yet to clarify that we're
talking about idioms and not just goals:
The most common way to use this explicitly (as opposed
to the implicit use when an argument is passed to test_expect_*) is to
skip all the tests at the start of a test script if we don't have some
essential prerequisite:
With or without such a change,
Reviewed-by: Jonathan Nieder <[email protected]>
Thanks.
