Re: [PATCH v3 2/3] read-tree -m: make error message for merging 0 trees less smart aleck

[Junio C Hamano]

Jonathan Nieder <jrnie...@gmail.com> writes:

>> @@ -226,9 +226,10 @@ int cmd_read_tree(int argc, const char **argv, const 
>> char *unused_prefix)
>>              setup_work_tree();
>>  
>>      if (opts.merge) {
>> -            if (stage < 2)
>> -                    die("just how do you expect me to merge %d trees?", 
>> stage-1);
>>              switch (stage - 1) {
>> +            case 0:
>> +                    die(_("you must specify at least one tree to merge"));
>> +                    break;
>
> This part looks good.

Thanks.  Modulo _(""); I do not think other messages from read-tree
are marked for i18n (yet).