Hi Markus,
On Thu, Oct 08, 2015 at 11:44:10AM +0300, Markus Lehtonen wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On 01/04/15 21:04, "Guido Günther" <a...@sigxcpu.org> wrote:
> 
> >I'll just use git-format-patch to format your series into patches and
> >add the comments. Won't get far today but lets start.
> >
> >On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 04:37:33PM +0300, Markus Lehtonen wrote:
> >> Adds support for defining the archive format of the output of
> >> git_archive_single(), e.g. 'zip'. Defaults to 'tar', as before.
> >> 
> >> Signed-off-by: Ed Bartosh <eduard.bart...@intel.com>
> >> Signed-off-by: Markus Lehtonen <markus.lehto...@linux.intel.com>
> >> ---
> >>  debian/control                     |  2 +-
> >>  gbp/command_wrappers.py            | 10 ++++++++
> >>  gbp/scripts/common/buildpackage.py | 48
> >>++++++++++++++++++++++----------------
> >>  3 files changed, 39 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
> >> 
> >> diff --git a/debian/control b/debian/control
> >> index e679bdf..985b7d8 100644
> >> --- a/debian/control
> >> +++ b/debian/control
> >> @@ -47,7 +47,7 @@ Depends: ${python:Depends},
> >>   python-pkg-resources,
> >>   python-six,
> >>  Recommends: pristine-tar (>= 0.5), cowbuilder, python-requests
> >> -Suggests: python-notify, unzip
> >> +Suggests: python-notify, unzip, zipmerge
> >
> >Do we need this? Debian does not support zip as upstream tarball
> >format. It might make sense on the rpm tools though.
> 
> RPM packages may use zip archive. I put the dependency here because the
> new functionality touches the common parts of gbp. In practice though, the
> zip format is only used by the rpm tools. Thus, the dependency could
> probably be moved to git-buildpackage-rpm subpackage. Would you be ok with
> this?

Yeah, that's fine.
Cheers,
 -- Guido
_______________________________________________
git-buildpackage mailing list
git-buildpackage@lists.sigxcpu.org
http://lists.sigxcpu.org/mailman/listinfo/git-buildpackage

Reply via email to