On Tue, Dec 30, 2014 at 11:16:37AM +0100, Tzafrir Cohen wrote: > On Sun, Dec 28, 2014 at 02:27:51PM +0100, Tzafrir Cohen wrote: > > On Sun, Dec 28, 2014 at 01:22:27PM +0100, Guido Günther wrote: > > > > > ====================================================================== > > > ERROR: test suite for <class 'tests.component.rpm.test_pq_rpm.TestPqRpm'> > > > > Speaking of tests, I think that the following should also be included in > > the branch (unless I missed it elsewhere): > > > > > > http://git.tzafrir.org.il/cgit/git-buildpackage.git/commit/?id=b2d8fa3bdb750ddf974cb605de4e5f0c9b4281cb > > > > That repo also has a brute-force rebase of buildpackage-rpm on top of > > 0.6.22 (just that command. Others are still missing). > > On top of that I now have an initial version of --git-mock - using mock > as a chroot builder for rpm packages. I basically copied the way > pbuilder is used (created a separate git-mock and used it as a builder). > Mock is already installed by default with its own permission elavtion > handler. > > http://git.tzafrir.org.il/cgit/git-buildpackage.git/commit/?h=buildpackage-rpm&id=03e38ad87c882d62ce9f54709fcf8c535edc36fa > > (I finally have clone URLs listed, but this is a single commit) > > Basic usage: > > gbp buildpackage-rpm --git-mock --git-dist=epel-6 > > Some notes: > * It runs mock twice. Once for generating the srpm and once for > generating the package from that. This is because some packages have > platform-dependent macros that may be expanded at srpm-build time. > > Avoiding that and using rpmbuild directly would have been faster. > > * I currently (for the sake of simplicity) avoid interpreting any > define-s sent in the command line and just assume the spec will be in > ./SPECS, sources in ./SOURCES, place the SRPM under ./SRPMS (I > consider it temporary). > > * I don't have a good default for the resulting files. Currently I place > the results under ./results/<dist>/<arch> > > What do you think?
I've cleaned up the patch a little and applied it to current git. I think assuming that the above directory layout is fine. Avoiding a full build for the SRPM would be nice though, did you make any progress on that one? Cheers, -- Guido _______________________________________________ git-buildpackage mailing list [email protected] http://lists.sigxcpu.org/mailman/listinfo/git-buildpackage
