Why doesn't `git merge` default to the tracked branch in the same way
e.g. `git push` does?
Often I find myself performing a pull, and when I switch branch I'm
told that "Your branch is behind the tracked remote branch 'origin/
master' by 12 commits". However, despite git knowing where my branch
is based and how far away it is, I still have to specify `git merge
origin/master` to perform the merge.
It's been pointed out that another `git pull` will usually have the
same effect, but it seems that this introduces a redundant fetch, and
to be honest I couldn't work out whether the pull would fail if the
remote repo was unavailable for any reason.
Obviously this is a really minor point, and it doesn't exactly affect
my working day for more than a few seconds, but I was curious what I
was missing that such a complete package as git had this little
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Git
for human beings" group.
To post to this group, send email to email@example.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at