On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 03:08:34AM -0800, Jeenu wrote: > Hi, > > I've named my branches in an a.b.c.d fashion, just to track them > according to their hierarchical structure. I can see all of them via. > 'git branch'. But surprisingly, I noticed that my .git/refs/heads > don't contain none of them. I could locate them only in .git/logs/refs/ > heads/. I don't know how or why they ended up there. All I remember is > doing some branch renames. > > I don't face any problems with checking out back and forth or with > committing, but I get an ambiguous warnings occasionally. What's the > best way to restore 'order' here? I mean to get them back inside refs/ > heads. Would a plain copy do?
The refs may be packed in .git/packed-refs, if your repository got gc'd recently - that is nothing to worry about. -- Petr "Pasky" Baudis A lot of people have my books on their bookshelves. That's the problem, they need to read them. -- Don Knuth -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Git for human beings" group. To post to this group, send email to git-us...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to git-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/git-users?hl=.