On Oct 26, 7:05 am, "Michael P. Soulier" <[email protected]>
wrote:
> On 24/10/10 Mike said:
>
> > This weekend we're cutting over to use git for our source code control
> > system.  I've imported about 20 years worth of previous history using
> > "git cvsimport" (takes about four hours).  I then cloned the resulting
> > repository onto five different machines (four Linux, one Solaris).
> > I've set up a cron job to do a nightly "git fsck" on each of the five
> > machines, and last night, two of the machines reported fsck errors on
> > their initial run.  Here's a sample of the errors:
>
> If you compare to a good copy, is Git correct? If it is, then the files were
> corrupted somehow.

Thanks for your suggestion.

It turned out that an old libcrypto was to blame.  The clone was
copying the repository to the pack-file with no errors, but the index
file that was created during the clone process was incorrect on the
two "bad" machines.  These machines (Fedora Core 2 vintage) were
running openssl-0.9.7a-26 and openssl-0.9.7a-35, and upgrading solved
the problem.

Mike.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Git 
for human beings" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/git-users?hl=en.

Reply via email to