On 1/2/11 08:27, "Konstantin Khomoutov" <flatw...@users.sourceforge.net> wrote:
Advertising
> On Mon, 31 Jan 2011 21:25:31 +0100 > Karel Vervaeke <ka...@vervaeke.info> wrote: > > (Formatting sanitized.) > [...] >>>> I can see various possible ways this might work, but I can't afford >>>> to get it wrong, so I'd be grateful for a nudge in the right >>>> direction. >>> >>> $ git push REMOTE D:REMOTE_BRANCH >>> >>> where >>> REMOTE is the name of the remote repository, >>> D is SHA-1 (or another name) of the specific commit you want to >>> push, REMOTE_BRANCH is the branch you want to update. > [...] >> Another approach would be to create another local branch containing >> only A B C D and then pushing that branch. > Strictly speaking that approach would not be different as the whole > reason for such a branch to exist in this case would be to use its name > in the git-push invocation; I referred to this using the "or another > name" phrase. > A tag would do as well, as E^ would, and so on according to the > "gitrevisions" manual page. Thanks for the advice. I was working on the right lines, but it's good to have reassurance. Roddie Grant -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Git for human beings" group. To post to this group, send email to git-users@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to git-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/git-users?hl=en.
