On Tue, 23 Aug 2011 04:47:32 -0700 (PDT)
pavan kumar <nagubandi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> why git uses branches to work on
Git does not need branches, a programmer is free to completely ignore
the fact branches exist.
> and why it creates a default branch "master"?
Since Git supports branches, every repository must have one (initial)
branch. The name "master" has no special meaning except that it's how
Git names the default branch when it initializes a new repository.
> can anyone give this information?
Start with "The Git Parable"  then move on to Git books and
HOWTOs . The "Pro Git" book listed there is freely available online.
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Git
for human beings" group.
To post to this group, send email to email@example.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
For more options, visit this group at