On Thu, 1 Sep 2011 08:15:58 -0700 (PDT)
Thomas Ferris Nicolaisen <tfn...@gmail.com> wrote:

> I have no idea what the effect of adding devices, blocks or channels,
> but symbolic links are just stored as you would expect.
> I have no idea why you would want to do any of this though. I would 
> generally regard having these special files inside your source code
> as a bad idea.
I think you're concentrating too much on that "source code" idea.

If we instead look at these two things: a) Unix has special files (such
as devices, named pipes etc), b) Git tracks hierarchies of files, then
one can think of using Git as something like a "versioned tar".
For instance, one could create a Git repo from a baseline (reference)
hierarchy of files (even the whole contents under "/") and then
replicate it to other hosts by cloning.  Or use this scheme as a
replacement for rdiff-backup or the like.  Not that I think it's a
bright idea but still...

Also a way more simpler use case can be thought of: one might want to
have, say, a set of named pipes in their repo to use them for testing.
Though in this particular case I'd reliy on their dynamic
creation/deletion by the test suite itself.

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Git 
for human beings" group.
To post to this group, send email to git-users@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
For more options, visit this group at 

Reply via email to