Hi All, I've stepped in a company that runs an existing CMS for their main website. They asked me a while ago to setup 5 new websites with that CMS. I've decided to have the original as branch MASTER and the other 5 as separate branches. When I make a feature/bug fix that needs to propagate to all versions, I create new branch, fix bug, and merge the change to all branches. Although it works, I don't like the idea of having all different websites in one repository. I'd rather have 6 different repositories (each website it's own) and fix bugs separately and merge to all repositories at the end. Does that make sense? What model would you prefer?
Thanks, Michal -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Git for human beings" group. To post to this group, send email to git-users@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to git-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/git-users?hl=en.