Jonathan Nieder <jrnie...@gmail.com> writes:

> Ramkumar Ramachandra wrote:
>>> Thomas Ferris Nicolaisen <tfn...@gmail.com> writes:
>
>>>> At least according to the documentation[1], "Git natively supports [...] 
>>>> ftp".
>>>>
>>>> This could need some clarification if pushing over ftp is not supported.
> [...]
>> -Git natively supports ssh, git, http, https, ftp, ftps, and rsync
>> -protocols. The following syntaxes may be used with them:
>> +Git natively supports ssh, git, http, https, and rsync protocols. The
>> +following syntaxes may be used with them:
>
> Perhaps the initial list should not be exhaustive, in which case we
> could say:
>
>       Git natively supports ssh, git, http, and https protocols.  The
>       following syntaxes may be used with them:
>
>       ...
>
>       Git also has (less efficient) support for fetching and pushing
>       over rsync protocol and fetching over ftp or ftps, using the
>       same "protocol://host/path/to/repo.git/" syntax.

Yeah, that, possibly with "These are deprecated; do not use them.",
would be a better way forward.  As we deprecated "rsync" long time
ago, perhaps we should remove it at Git 2.0 or somewhere around
that.

By the way, that old patch by Ram in question was *not* incorrect
per-se back then when dumb http was still more prevalent option
between the two http transports.  Fetching over dumb http and dumb
ftp were both equally bad ;-)  It just has become less relevant as
more people start equating http with the smart http, where there is
no equivalent "smart ftp".

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Git 
for human beings" group.
To post to this group, send email to git-users@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
git-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/git-users?hl=en.

Reply via email to