On Tue, 26 Mar 2013 02:07:03 +0400
Konstantin Khomoutov <flatw...@users.sourceforge.net> wrote:
> > - It appears your comments for the "can git support 'sparse'
> > workspaces" question was lost. All that you posted was "Yes and No.
> > Git supports". It appears that the remainder of your comments were
> > cut off.
> Another thing which might help you while not addressing the specific
> problem are "sparse clones" -- the only problem is that they are
> "depth-sparse", not "width-spare": you can tell Git to only fetch a
> tip commit (or N commits) of a specified branch to conserve bandwidth
> and disk space. The resulting repository will obviously be "lame"
> compared to a full-fledged clone, but that would work OK for certain
One thing I forgot to mention (because never used it myself) is Git's
ability to do sparse checkouts (that is, "width-sparse") .
Basically, this allows you to have only a subset of directories checked
out into your work tree; all the history is still there, locally.
Also note that this is a completely client-side feature.
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Git
for human beings" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.