I am not very sure, but I think you can use the option strategy to what you
want. Reading the documentation, it says

"using the ours strategy simply discards all patches from the <branch>,
which makes little sense"

So, I think you can use it to discard all changes from the other commits.
It is just a guess.


William Seiti Mizuta
@williammizuta
Caelum | Ensino e Inovação
www.caelum.com.br


On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 9:48 AM, Stoney Jackson <dr.sto...@gmail.com> wrote:

> I have many commits: A, B, C, ..., Z. I plan to do some housekeeping using
> rebase. One thing I want to do is to reorder Z to be the first commit.
> However, other commits will be in conflict with Z's changes. I know I can
> go through and interactively resolve the conflicts manually. But this is
> tedious and error prone. I would like to be able to mark Z's changes as
> authoritative while rebasing. That is, I want to tell git, "whenever a
> commit conflicts with Z (during this rebase operation) I want you to keep
> Z's changes and ignore the other." Is this possible? Is there another
> (hopefully better) way to accomplish what I'm trying to do?
>
>
>  --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Git for human beings" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to git-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Git 
for human beings" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to git-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Reply via email to