git-archive seems interesting, but alas, I *do* want to deliver a git 
repository, because there will be times (albeit rare) where we may code up 
a quick on-site fix at the customer site, and want to be able to 
conveniently deliver that update back to our shop.  git-bundle is ideally 
suited for that situation, and if I'm just using git to package up the 
source files, I can accomplish the same thing just by removing the .git 
folder.  I'm thinking a series of scripts that makes the necessary shallow 
clones and packages up the resulting repositories is probably going to be 
my best solution, and just dropping the super-repo idea.  It was just a 
convenience thing (there isn't any code in the top-level folder for the 
super-repo to track), so it's looking like that would be providing more 
work than benefit.

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Git 
for human beings" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
For more options, visit

Reply via email to